Shabana Mahmood criticized the United Kingdom for not taking strong enough action in deporting failed asylum seekers as she introduced a significant overhaul, leading to widespread criticism. The Home Secretary revealed a series of stringent steps, instructing officials to be more assertive in removing families, including children, without hesitation. Additionally, the government is considering enforced returns to Syria following the regime change under Bashar al-Assad.
In a policy paper released recently, Mahmood criticized previous administrations for being lenient, stating, “We have failed to demonstrate the necessary strength or determination to uphold our right to repatriate those without legal status.” Under the new guidelines, individuals granted asylum will have to wait 20 years before applying for permanent settlement.
Furthermore, those with protected status will undergo reviews every two and a half years, potentially facing removal if their home country is deemed safe. However, these measures have faced strong opposition from Labour MPs, human rights activists, and other opposition factions.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome expressed dismay in Parliament, denouncing the government for dismantling the rights and protections of individuals who have endured immense trauma. She questioned the morality of adopting such harsh policies and criticized the Home Secretary for potentially aligning with controversial figures like Tommy Robinson.
Far-right figure Robinson and Reform deputy leader Richard Tice supported some of Labour’s initiatives, suggesting a shift in Mahmood’s stance. Mahmood emphasized in her parliamentary address that the UK’s asylum support system, though generous, is attracting individuals to the country, warning that failure to control the system could strengthen divisive forces.
Additionally, the government will introduce new pathways for refugees through community and volunteer sponsorships, along with opportunities for displaced students to study in the UK. However, the legal obligation to provide accommodation and financial aid to asylum seekers will be terminated.
The policy document highlighted a reluctance to repatriate families, leading to prolonged periods of free support. Mahmood indicated that financial assistance will be initially offered for voluntary returns, with enforced returns considered for non-compliant cases.
Furthermore, the appeals process will be streamlined to provide claimants with a single opportunity to challenge refusals. A new appeals body will be established to address the backlog of cases, aiming to expedite decisions and minimize the cycle of claims and appeals.
Labour’s latest asylum proposal emphasizes support only for those adhering to UK laws, with consequences for non-compliance or disruptive behavior. Mahmood emphasized the need for reform due to the significant influx of asylum seekers and the perception of the UK as a preferred destination.
Critics have urged the government to reconsider its approach, expressing concerns that the reforms may exacerbate existing issues within the asylum system, potentially leading to more delays and inhumane treatment. Enver Solomon, chief executive of Refugee Council, cautioned against revisiting asylum decisions every 30 months, suggesting that it may result in further chaos rather than control.